Hope you’re all gearing up for Newtonmas, not long now.
Anyway, just to let you know SNARED was selected as one of Amazon Publishing’s top-selling books of 2015 and is on sale at £1.49 (also in the Australian deal, too). If you haven’t bought it, well now’s your chance. Linky and the deal page is here (some crackers on that list)
Oh, and in other news… I’ve signed a three-book deal with Amazon Publishing’s Thomas & Mercer imprint, home of SNARED among many others.
What? Who?
The deal is for the first two books in the DI Simon Fenchurch series, THE HOPE THAT KILLS and VICIOUS CYCLE, hardcore police procedurals set in that London. The east end mainly, though Islington features heavily. And it’s also for the second in the DS Vicky Dodds series, FALLEN, picking up eighteen months after SNARED. What’s happened to Vicky in that time? Well.
When?
Tentative dates, which will be updated in due course, are THE HOPE THAT KILLS in May/June 2016, VICIOUS CYCLE in September 2016 and FALLEN in January 2017. I’ve delivered the first two books and I’m going through edits for HOPE just now. Done an outline for FALLEN, but not put finger to key yet.
Why?
Because they’re a brilliant publisher who treat authors as people and not like cattle. I love working with them. They seem to like me, too. I know a lot of other authors with the imprint and nobody has anything even vaguely negative to say. Plus, they’re one of the few publishers who know how to really sell ebooks (I’d add Bookoutoure to that small list). And I’ve loved the process of publishing and selling SNARED.
Wow! Erm, what about Cullen?
Ah, yes. That publishing schedule is aggressive as hell and shows a huge amount of support for me and my scribblings. There’s a knock-on effect for the Cullen series, which means there won’t be any new Cullen novels until next Christmas, dependent on that publishing schedule. Happily, this matches my own thoughts (as outlined in the afterword for COWBOYS). With series books, especially self-published ones, there’s a law of diminishing returns. Think of it as a funnel, wide at the start but tapering off. The Cullen books have got better as I’ve written them and improved my craft, but the sales need a bit of time to catch up. Hence why I’ve started another two series. Hence why I’ve slowed down publication of Cullen (first three were nine months apart, last two were ten). I still love/hate the bugger as much as ever, and I hope you enjoy the Fenchurch books as much as I have writing them. And, of course, Ms Dodds sophomore adventure.
Yeah, so there we are. Happy Newtonmas when it happens. I’ll probably do year-end stuff over the next few weeks.
Oh and I’m properly on Schoolbook now. Sorry, Facebook. Friend me there, or whatever it is the kids do these days.
— Ed
 

It’s almost that time of year again when they let me out into the public…
Book Week Scotland is organised by the Scottish Book Trust and runs from the 23rd to the 29th of November and I’ll be appearing at four events that week, making up for the no other events I’ve done this year.
In East Lothian, I’ll be appearing in Haddington’s library on the Tuesday 24th at 11am (though I think this might be a closed-invite event), in Musselburgh library at 2pm on Wednesday 25th and Cockenzie House at 7.30pm on Saturday 28th. They’re all an easy drive from Edinburgh and are served by pretty good bus routes, I think.
These will be “In conversation with…” style events and I’ll be appearing with Len Wanner, author of Tartan Noir: The definitive guide to Scottish Crime Fiction (linky) and a very good friend of mine. Expect banter and humour akin to the better bits of my books. I doubt I’ll read from any books — that’s what the books are for.
Tickets are free (as in beer) and available here —
http://www.eastlothian.gov.uk/info/427/libraries/1684/book_week_scotland_2015
On the Thursday, I’ll be in Glasgow at the City of Glasgow College as the token self-published author where I’ll be talking digital publishing with Adrian Searle of Freight Publishing, Kyle MacRae of Blasted Heath and others. Again, free entry and details are here —
http://scottishbooktrust.com/about/events/electronic-publishing-writing-in-the-digital-age
If I get my act together, I’ll even have some paperbacks to sell and sign. Happy to sign Kindles and so on, but I draw the line at most body parts.
Given I don’t have to do many events like these, contractually, this is one of the few opportunities you’ll get to see my ugly mug and speak to me. Always happy to tweet and email.
And yes, I’ve been very busy — some big news will be rolling along soon.
— Ed

Hey — just a quick note from me to say Cullen 7, COWBOYS & INDIANS is out now! Sincerest thanks to everyone who has preordered it — it should be on your Kindle now, waiting for your eyes to read it. Feels good to have it out my computer and into the wide, wide world.
Some early review quotes from Goodreads —
“I have read all the books in the Scott Cullen series and I honestly think this is the best one so far.” — Adele Mitchell
“Overall, a fantastic book by one of my favorite authors … easily the best book I’ve read so far this year.” — Tam McGregor
Buy it from Amazon now.
Oh, and if you haven’t bought it, SNARED is £1.99 today only.
Cheers,
Ed

Q. When is your next book coming out?
A. This is always changing. Few ways to keep up with it — subscribe to my newsletter, follow me on Facebook and Twitter, or check out my Current Projects page.
Q. How do I contact you? 
A. Twitter is usually best. Failing that, email me using this form — I reply to every email. Unless it goes into my spam folder, of course.
Q. I’m a publisher/magazine and I want to publish something of yours for a huge amount of money.
A. Allan Guthrie of Jenny Brown Associates is my literary agent. Contact him through their site.
Q. I’m a screenwriter/producer/director and I want to option one of your books for a huge amount of money.
A. Talk to Al.
Q. Are your books available on audio?
A. Not yet. Something on my todo list.
Q. Love your cover artist! Who is he?
A. She. My girlfriend does most of my covers. Or she tells me how to do them. If you’d like a cover, ping me an email.
Q. Who handles the ebook and print formatting for your self-published titles?
A. Me. I use Scrivener to output pretty clean Kindle files. I also use it to write my books — an awesome tool and really cheap. Takes a wee bit of getting used to but it’s really powerful. There a ton of good sites out there showing you how to use that to publish your ebooks.
Q. In what order should I read the Cullen books?
A. Ghost in the Machine, Devil in the Detail, Fire in the Blood, Dyed in the Wool, Bottleneck, Windchill and Cowboys & Indians.
Q. Will you write an eight Cullen novel?
A. Yup. I’m probably going to produce them every twelve to fifteen months or so, due to other commitments. The first three books were published eight months apart.
Q. Can I write a Cullen book on Kindle Worlds?
A. No, not yet anyway.
Q. Have any of your books been turned into film or tv?
A. Not yet.
Q. Why are your ebooks only available on Kindle?
A. A couple of reasons. I’ve got books published by Thomas & Mercer, Amazon’s publishing arm, and they don’t aggregate to competitors. For my self-published work, I tried selling on other channels, e.g. Nook/Kobo/iBooks, and nobody bought them. Amazon’s KDP gives you lots of benefits for going exclusive, and it works for me. My books are DRM-free so the files can be bought on the Kindle Store and transferred to any e-reading device using cables and stuff. Really easy, even my dad can do it.

Early last year, I realised my TV watching was sadly years behind. I’d been rubbish. I’d never seen BREAKING BAD or THE WIRE or THE SOPRANOS. I’d been far too busy writing, reading and working in all that time. So I decided to fix it. My New Year’s Resolution this year was to get myself up to date with TV watching and I’m going to write a few blog posts about what I’ve watched. Hope this isn’t too boring for you (I’ve got to fill this blog up with something).
Let’s start with BREAKING BAD (watched on DVD, available on Netflix). What hasn’t been said about this? There seems to be a bit of a schism in the world about this show — those who don’t quite get it and those who foam at the mouth. Count me as among the rabid sector. What’s so good about it? The writing, pure and simple. The acting is first-rate, especially Bryan Cranston as Walter White, with a rich supporting cast, especially Bob Odenkirk as amoral lawyer Saul Goodman (more on him soon). The cinematography is excellent, getting better as the series goes on, with the arty, angular shots adding to the claustrophobic feel. But, really, it’s the writing. One of the great flaws in Hollywood just now is the poor quality of writing, especially in blockbusters, with action scene set-pieces thrown together with no regard to narrative logic. The strength of BB is the characterisation and the logic — every action has a reaction consistent with the character’s behaviour. The pace is fast, getting through plot points at speed but never getting bogged down. It’s also slow and intense — everything’s focused on with precision, drama is allowed to unfold. And over the course of the series, we see the descent of Walter White from meek Chemistry teacher who’ll do anything for his family, to criminal drug lord, prizing his money over everything. One of the big learnings for me as a writer last year was avoiding melodrama, which commonly means character change happening too quickly — BB showed that unfold naturally. It’s just perfect.
One of the best domestic TV dramas of 2014 was LINE OF DUTY (BBC) series two. Up to a point. Crisply written with powerful twists and cliffhangers, this was a real acting powerhouse, particularly the performance of Keeley Hawes, who I’d always considered lightweight. She’s maturing into a strong actor, showing the psychosis of her character, at least as good as Lennie James in the first series. All that aside, the writing let it down in the last episode. A powerful drama essentially led nowhere and broke one of the fundamental rules of writing — don’t cheat the audience. A flashback showed the events shown in the first episode were incomplete and had misled us. Really poor writing. Or was it editing? One of the strengths of TRUE DETECTIVE and S3 of RIPPER STREET (see below) was the running time was flexible, varying between 50 and 65 minutes depending on the episode. The last episode of this could’ve done with another 15-20 minutes to show what happened, not have some vague flashback. Hopefully the third series will learn from this… It reminded me of the ending of BROADCHURCH (ITV), which left too much open at the end.
A perfect ending was Danish/Swedish co-production THE BRIDGE II (BBC), pretty much the only Scandi-crime I’ve watched that doesn’t bore me to tears. Building on the events of the first series, the odd couple pairing of Saga Norén and Martin Rohde are a perfect inversion of the Hollywood buddy cop formula. And what an ending — that’s how to do a cliffhanger. Only shame is how long it takes for them to produce a series, but maybe a lot of people could learn about letting things percolate, me included.
We watched a lot of stuff on Sky last year, including bingeing on the 24 miniseries (Sky), which I can’t remember anything about. Drones or something. It was fairly entertaining, but the whole thing just feels played out. Other favourites were geeking out on ARROW and THE FLASH (Sky), though they started to feel increasingly hollow. Arrow started out a mishmash of an intense, driven superhero and some tedious teenage soap opera, saved by a mostly brilliant supporting cast — Felicity, Diggle and Detective Lance were all top notch, Laurel and Thea a lot less so. Usually suffers a deep midseason lull before remembering the point and gearing up to a frenetic finale, Arrow lost it for me this year with a death too many. Barry Allen started out as a guest star in ARROW and soon became The Flash. As a guest, he was witty and energetic, a strong contender for a perfect Peter Parker (that’s Spider-Man, in case you’re not that geek). As a lead, he’s let down by boring writing and a really bad supporting cast — Harrison, Cisco, Caitlin, Iris, Eddie. Meh. Gave up on both of these early this year and haven’t missed them.
Another Sky series we watched was the piss-poor FOREVER. There’s a mantra that you learn as much from bad writing as good. This is bad writing and I learnt a lot. It’s essentially a NYC police procedural told from the perspective of the ME. Fairly interesting premised. The thing is, he’s immortal. Cue lots of getting killed and waking up in one of the rivers around Manhattan. Flirting with the detective who’s investigating him. It’s sub-CASTLE, if that’s a thing. Looks like it’s been cancelled. Thank God.
We started getting into streaming TV late last year, watching Amazon Prime Instant Video on my Playstation 3 (subsequently burnt and replaced with an Amazon Fire TV). One of the highlights was binge-watching RIPPER STREET (Amazon Prime) from the start, including the Amazon-produced third season. The first two are cracking, fast-paced and intense. Freed from the constraints of TV schedules, the variable episode length in the third allowed the drama to unfold naturally, except in a tedious mid-season episode set entirely in the police station — an archetypal “ship-in-a-bottle episode”. The whole season ended at a natural point, so I was surprised it got another two series. Very pleased, though.
Although it tailed off in the second season, LIE TO ME (Amazon Prime/Netflix) started off with an interesting premise — Tim Roth stars as a body language expert who can spot lies. Gets into the old case of the week formula, one week working a private divorce case, the next for the FBI, that sort of malarkey. I found it useful for the body language analysis early on, but soon got annoyed by the lead character’s increasingly annoying behaviour (I’ve *never* been guilty of that, ahem). Key learning of it for me was destroying the “smartest man in the room” myth — the reason I can’t watch HOUSE is it’s all sleight-of-hand magic, what’s in his head is being kept back from the audience, who don’t have the medical training to understand what’s going on. Similarly, the third season of SHERLOCK (BBC) disappeared up its own arse when it forgot it was there to feature crimes being solved in an entertaining way and instead focused on how amazing a character Sherlock Holmes is. And featuring no plot. Or entertainment, except for a hilarious stag do. Don’t get me wrong, I love character as much as the next guy, but story = character + plot. Too much character and it’s self-indulgent, too much plot and it’s ridiculous. On that note, ELEMENTARY (Sky) was fairly watchable, allegedly coming from the same initial idea as SHERLOCK. Sick Boy from TRAINSPOTTING was entertaining playing off a CHARLIE’S ANGEL, though it felt a bit lacking in emotion and the third series descended into classic “how interesting are we?” tropes.
Another case-of-the-week procedural I actually got into was FRINGE (DVD, Netflix or Amazon, I think). Centred around the FBI’s Fringe division, investigating paranormal crimes, it was more than an update to the X-FILES. The rich cast made up for the initially wooden lead in Agent Dunham with the brilliant Walter Bishop, a proper crackpot mad scientist. The first few series got the blend of case of the week and season story arc to a tee, exploring the implications of Walter’s youthful arrogance. A trial of a serial storyline in season three, featuring some of the best parallel universe storytelling I’ve ever seen or read, soon descended into tedium in the fifth season, where we didn’t get past the second episode. Shame.
The other real highlight of the year was TRUE DETECTIVE (Sky). The first season brought a quality cinema mindset to TV, with high production values and big stars in small roles. Like BB, it had a brooding intensity, which I loved. Matthew McConaughey — Matthew McConaughey — was excellent as Rust Cohl, shown both as a driven cop and as a broken-down wreck. The interplay with Woody from Cheers was insightful and drove the story on, rather than sticking in expositional dialogue. It’s not perfect. There are accusations of misogyny, which I can see but the likely truth is every character in it is horrible, even down to the kids. And the ending was the weakest part, descending into mumbo jumbo. But that was just ten minutes of a pretty-much perfect series.
Okay, that’s the things I can remember about last year. I’ll follow this up with the first half of 2015 soon. Hope that was at least vaguely entertaining.
Cheers,
Ed

Hope things are all good with you out there. Sadly, COWBOYS has suffered a slight delay, mainly due to my own incompetence at setting deadlines (or, rather, calculating them). New release date is 31-Aug-15, so only +30 days. Nothing sinister going on, the book’s in the editing stage. And to think I used to be a project manager…
In slightly different news, I’ve just set up a Thunderclap for the book. For those who don’t know, basically it’ll send a load of Facebook posts and Tweets on launch day and hopefully cut down the spam. Sign up to support it at the following link —
https://www.thunderclap.it/projects/28078-cowboys-indians-release?locale=en
Cheers,
Ed

Let’s start with SUPERNATURE book 2, JUST WALKING THE DEAD. A little novella thing, 15,000 words of vampire-related deviancy. It’s out on Friday (12-Jun-15, my birthday!) and is on pre-order just now —
Universal Amazon link — http://mybook.to/EJDead
Magic, what’s next?
Oh — yes. This.
The seventh Cullen novel. I’m getting into deep edits with it and shooting for a release on 01-Aug-15. It’s a bit of a monster and has taken me longer to write but the initial feedback seems to show it’s worth the extra effort. It’s about 25% longer than the other Cullens (still shorter than SNARED) and is pretty bloody complex.
With a series of male rapes around Edinburgh baffling police, a bloodied corpse is found in the shadow of Dean Bridge, handcuffed and half-naked. Who is he? Why is he handcuffed? Did he fall or was he pushed?
As the victim is identified, the case only gets murkier. Detective Sergeant Scott Cullen of Police Scotland’s Edinburgh Major Investigation Team is sucked into the depths of the city’s financial services sector, facing up to some old enemies and creating some new ones. Just months into his new role, Cullen is torn by the trials of management, putting a friendship on the line. New leads take them no further forward — too many suspects in a world where nobody trusts anybody else and all are out for themselves. Can Cullen catch a killer who could be anyone?
From bestselling author Ed James, Cowboys and Indians is a tightly woven, gripping crime novel challenging the honesty of professional liars.
Universal Amazon link — http://mybook.to/EJCowboys
Cheers,
Ed

Here’s a sample of some SNARED reviews. Currently averaging 4.8 after 56 reviews on Amazon.co.uk which is blowing my mind.
http://tammerz.booklikes.com/post/1132523/snared
http://edisbooklighthouse.blogspot.co.uk/
https://roccoroux.wordpress.com/2015/05/12/book-review-snared-by-ed-james/
Buy it on Amazon (Kindle and paperback) — mybook.to/ejsnared (universal link)
Had a few people hit the blog over the last few days looking for news of COWBOYS AND INDIANS, Cullen seven. I’m working on the second draft of it just now (some problems with the stupid amount of complexity I’ve put into it and getting the end to work, might have to kill some darlings but that’s for next week). Looking like a July or August release is still achievable but I’m not getting into the mess I got with WINDCHILL…
— Ed

Just a quick note to let you guys know I’m actively WRITING this book, the seventh in the Cullen series. Taken a bit longer to plan and outline, which is definitely paying off (though still not perfect, ha). Got to 25% midway through my fourth day of writing, so it’s going pretty well so far.
Needless to say, it’s not about the genocide of the American indigenous population over the last 500 years. The cowboys relate to certain police officers, but also colleagues of the murder victim. The Indians are, of course, natives of the Indian subcontinent, home of much of the outsourced IT development in UK/US since the late 90s.
Very interesting writing given what happened at the end of the last book, too. There’s a lot less moaning about promotions in this one.
I’ve kind of neglected my self-published works over the last six months since WINDCHILL, so it’ll be good to get some instant karma with this book. There’s something else in the pipes, which some of you have been after for a year or so…
It’s a pretty good project to get myself stuck in while I await the impending release of SNARED. I hate waiting for anything and I really am Mr Impatient (should just get it over with and change my name to Ed Impatient).
— Ed
SNARED out 28-Apr-15! Pre-order now!
“A great story, regardless and one guaranteed to spark debate” — Goodreads review
http://mybook.to/ejsnared

Just a quick note to say SHOT THROUGH THE HEART is 99p/99c on Kindle for the next two days.
Oh, what on Earth could this be?

— Ed

A few months ago, I was watching Sky’s MONDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL with Jamie Carragher and Gary Neville, an absolutely peerless dissection of the more subtler nuances of football (soccer to those in the US). If anyone had told me ten years ago that those two would be the best pundits on TV… Anyway, Neville made a comment about a team’s defensive frailties along the lines of their plan being broken and once you let go of that, you’re improvising and then you’re really in trouble.
In football, and I suppose general sports, planning is essential to success at the top level.
Top teams nowadays have a huge backroom staff, usually in excess of a hundred, and most of them aren’t medical staff. A team will have a large number of ProZone analysts, looking through previous match footage of upcoming opponents, looking where their gaps are and presenting it to the manager. The manager will devise a plan and his job is to communicate it to the players.
Footballers don’t get paid for running around for ninety minutes on a Saturday, they get paid for that plus spend five hours a day going through fitness training (maybe an hour once the season’s underway) and a lot of drills and whiteboard activities. Drills let the team work together on specific scenarios they’ll face in the match, so when in the 38th minute, a player makes a run down the right unmarked and someone hits a sweet ball to them, it appears improvised but they will in reality have gone through that move fifty times.
What the hell am I talking about? Well, that quote keeps rattling around in my head as I go through my latest work-in-progress, FUTURE SHOCK. This started life as a short story about five years ago and I decided to flesh it out to a novel length work last year. The results weren’t great, largely because I’d been improvising and the plot was all over the place. It was a sobering reflection on how little “winging it” can actually work. I’ve now spent four weeks this year going back to the drawing board on it and doing what I should’ve done last year.
Plan.
I’ve gone through several iterations of a complex plan, further complicated by the fact I’d written 65,000 words of the novel and have to keep that in sync.
They generally talk about two types of writers — planners and pantsers, or architects and gardeners. To me, it’s just the same thing, depending on when you do your planning. Pantsers, i.e. write by the seat of your pants, generally create 60,000+ words in a dreadful first draft then edit it until it’s something that works. I learnt a long time ago that I’m much better planning first and getting the story nailed down before I write it. It still allows for improvisation but it means when you’re tearing the structure apart, it’s a 10,000 word synopsis you’re cutting up and not a 90,000 word novel. You’re less tempted to keep flawed storylines and more inclined to kill your darlings (remove the flab).
I just wish I’d listened to my own advice in October. This is a sobering reflection of how badly things can go. FWIW, the two drafts of THE HOPE THAT KILLS took me seven weeks all in, and is one of the most complete books i’ve ever written, tightly plotted, exciting, full of character and with a story that gets emotional attachment on page one. Likewise, the outline for COWBOYS AND INDIANS is nice and clean, with the sort of complexity that was maybe missing from WINDCHILL.
Back to the drawing board.
— Ed
Current project — FUTURE SHOCK, draft 2
Next project — COWBOYS AND INDIANS, draft 1

Fascinating piece on the register about Edinburgh scifi writer Charles Stross’s decision to dump Word for LibreOffice on his Mac.
I’m of a similar mind — I despise using Word and have been using Scrivener for over two and a half years to create my books, definitely a key reason in why I can be so fast.
My experience of writing (just finished my 13th novel) has taught me there’s three key phases —
Outlining
Writing
Editing
(Note that pantsers/gardeners, i.e. make it up as you go along, tend to do writing, then outlining, then editing, but it’s a lot less clear — they’ll write a book and then map it to a story structure, delete chunks and write new chunks and generally muck about until they get something. I tried it and it’s definitely not how I’m wired)
Anyway, I usually devote a third of the total time to each phase, say two weeks on each. Two weeks of messing about in Scapple then Scrivener to get my scene outline nailed and I can easily crack out an outline into a full novel in a fortnight, say 80,000 words. I then edit it so it makes sense then get feedback from three trusted alpha readers. Then I’m into another two weeks of changes to make it better.
What happens next is the industrial editing — structural then line then copy then proofing — and it’s all done in Word, using track changes. Scrivener doesn’t come into it, not the intention of the product.
But word is so bloody awful, especially the Mac one but the Windows one is so flaky. I want it to track changes and do it well. Word wants to do a million and one things very adequately, at best. Except for crashing, that it does perfectly. And adding a stupid ribbon. And Aargh.
Going through my final self-edit of CRASH INTO MY ARMS (really needs a new title) and it occurred to me how to get Scrivener working with track changes. Word has a decent feature to compare two historical versions of the same document and mark up changes. Tried it and the results are perfect. No more having to use the bugger until I’m in industrial editing mode, thank God.
— Ed

Oddly enough, as I sit down to start work in anger on COWBOYS AND INDIANS (Cullen 7), set in the world of IT project delivery at a fictional financial institution I featured in GHOST IN THE MACHINE, a fascinating study into IT project failures hits my inbox —
http://mudano.com/download/metastudy/
Given I’m just away to start creating a fictional disastrous IT project in my head, this is a stark reminder of how much stranger than fiction fact can be. Some of the case studies in here should remind you that money thrown at people who sound like they know what they’re doing but don’t only ever results in wasted money. There are a lot of snake oil salesmen will out there.
— Ed
Current project – outline of COWBOYS & INDIANS (Cullen 7)
Next project – draft 3 of CRASH INTO MY ARMS (DI Fenchurch 1)

WH Smith’s blog just announced the results of a recent poll on their top crime writers of all time and, apparently, I’m the 94th best crime writer of all time, ahead of people like Sara Paretsky, Martin Cruz Smith, James Lee Burke and Cecelia Ahern. Oh and some guy called Edgar Allan Poe, who invented detective fiction as a genre. Staggering, especially as they don’t even sell my books…

http://blog.whsmith.co.uk/best-crime-authors-time-voted/

Some seriously good writers in there, notably Mr MacBride at the top there – his THE MISSING AND THE DEAD is already my book of the year 2015. Staggeringly original police procedural.

Thanks to everyone who voted for me. Shucks. 😉

–Ed

Just noticed this morning that I’m up to 999 reviews for GHOST IN THE MACHINE on Amazon.co.uk, averaging 4.2 which is pretty high for a perma-free book.
This is completely insane to me – when I published it almost three years ago, I didn’t think that I’d get nine reviews, let alone this number (and being into my second year as a full-time author, either). Crazy craziness.
Serious thanks to everyone who’s read the book and posted a review, even the one-stars. Being able to do this for a living is the best thing that’s ever happened to me.
— Ed
Current project – Draft 2 of CRASH INTO MY ARMS (DI Fenchurch 1)
Next project – Final outline of COWBOYS & INDIANS (Cullen 7)

Just a quick note to say I’ll be interviewing James Oswald at the Edinburgh George St Waterstones (damn, what happened to that possessive apostrophe?) tomorrow night, Thursday 12th Feb, to promote his new novel, Prayer for the Dead — I think the event’s free but ticketed – details here.
— Ed

(This post is a rambling essay on genres but also features some news about the Supernature series and what happens next there…)
I posted a response to a thread on KBoards, one of the better places to discuss self-publishing and all that jazz, on the subject of using pen names to write in different genres.
Essentially, I’d tend to go with a pen name for each genre, based on my experience. As you know, I predominantly write police procedurals set in Edinburgh, Scotland, which I do not at all badly out of at all. A few years ago, I hit upon an idea to do a vampire thriller set in the Highlands of Scotland, called SHOT THROUGH THE HEART.
What I found when I released it was my existing audience either 1) sort of, kind of liked SHOT (about 20%) or 2) were largely ambivalent to it and the sales were nothing like for the other books in my DC Scott Cullen series, usually by a factor of ten (if I’d spent that time writing another Cullen, I’d have earned a lot more cash).
My thinking in the fourteen months since publication has been all over the place. In 2013, I started out wanting to write a sequel to establish a series. Then, when I started getting the “vampire=bad” feedback, it kind of morphed into a police procedural with vampires – I’ve finally written that book as a straight police procedural without any vampires (CRASH INTO MY ARMS, I’ll be starting the second draft next week), which’ll mesh well with my core audience of police procedural fans.
But… I get an email or social media post every couple of weeks asking what’s happening to Supernature. I’ve got a desire, if not exactly burning then at least on fire, to write a proper sequel to SHOT. I’m thinking through how to make that work – a revised draft of SHOT with more of a police element seems to be an idea I can’t get away from and I had a bash at that last week, which was going in a promising direction. The bits I disliked about SHOT were instantly removed by the police stuff and the flow of the story was a hell of a lot better. There’s quite a lot of Scottish folklore I could explore with that.
One thing I noticed last summer is based on trying the old “product funnels” thing, as espoused in WRITE. PUBLISH. REPEAT., by making SHOT free for a period. The result was it ended up cannibalising sell-on from GHOST IN THE MACHINE, the first freebie in the Cullen series – rather than buying book 2 in the series after enjoying book 1, the readers seemed to go for the other free one. Because it was vampires and they tended to dislike it, so I lost sales. If it’d been a straight pol proc, I think it’d have worked, most likely.
Of course, it could be that SHOT just isn’t that good – another reason a redraft will help is it’ll allow me to know if it’s a quality thing. Alternatively, it could be that I’ve not released book 2 in the series, so I’ve no real idea if it is a money-spinner. It did take about a year for it to break even on publicity and editing costs, which is another reason I felt my fingers got burnt. Finally, it could be that the cover is too “police procedural” – moody, monochrome shot with bright text – and it jars with the genre.
In summary, the lessons for me from publishing in multiple genres are –
1) People who like a writer writing in a genre tend to like the genre more than the writer, i.e. they’re less likely to buy you writing in another genre.
2) There are people who like the writer as much as the genre but they’re a lot lower. The crossover could be managed by other means, e.g. mailing list – “hey I’ve got a new book out in another genre under another name. You might not like it so I’m not forcing it down your throat” etc.
3) I might not have gone after the fans of vampire books in the right way (title, cover, product description, author name, etc). They might think it’s a police procedural.
4) If you’ve managed to get some level of success with your “day job” writing in a genre, that means you’ve got some tricks you’ve applied in building an audience there which should be applicable to writing in a new genre (and there’ll be some element of fun in learning it)
5) Watch your product funnels don’t cannibalise the main genre series.
Hope that’s of interest to you. I’ll be getting back to that redraft of SHOT in the summertime and will most likely do the second book back to back, while the characters and genre are still fresh in my head. At the moment, it’s called JUST WALKING THE DEAD, thought I really want to use the title HUNGRY LIKE THE WOLF, somewhere.
— Ed

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmnWXhxlh14]One of my very favourite songs of all time – GETTING AWAY WITH IT by Electronic, the late 80s side project of NewOrder’s Bernard Sumner and Johnny Marr, then late of the Smiths, featuring Neil Tennant of the Pet Shop Boys – features the line “I’ve been talking to myself just to suggest that I’m selfish.”
What a curious way to start a blog post, you might think. Well, I might or might not be selfish, but I have been talking to myself. On purpose.

One of the best writing craft books I read last year was by David Morrell, author of FIRST BLOOD, the low-key novel that kicked off the Rambo mega-franchise (God, I hate that phrase). It’s pretty and very insightful, particularly if you ever sell your books to the Film industry (I’m not calling them movies). [No – I’ve not sold anything to Film/TV, so don’t ask.]
One of the techniques he uses in the book is to have a written conversation with yourself about a book, sort of like “Good morning, David. How are you today?” / “I’m good, David, though I’m struggling with my new book.” / “Tell me about it.” / “Well, I forgot to put a story in.” Something like that. The idea is you talk to yourself about the book, refining the questioning and the idea as you go but leaving an ‘audit trail’ (Argh) of what you’ve discussed, which could be minor fragments of things you can pick up on the way, or if you get into a dead end you can go back.
Anyway, I thought it was madness and forgot about it. Until I wrote FUTURE SHOCK, a sci-fi thriller I’ve been working on for a good number of years – I wrote it as a short story in 2009, I think, then dusted it off in September with a view to turning it into a novella. It turned into a novel. But I forgot to include a story. Good bits happened in the opening act, then the hero got a job and got bored and quit it and went on holiday (which meant I could show the world 150 years from now) then all the story was wedged into the last third. I tried unpicking it on Monday, having turned in a first draft of CRASH INTO MY ARMS, and came into a cold sweat and a grumpy mood. I couldn’t get it to work.
I had a look at maybe redrafting SHOT THROUGH THE HEART (which meant re-outlining the story from the start) then went to the gym in the evening and beasted the weights. Sitting in the hot tub after (at the gym, not in my house – I’m not like some authors), I started to think about the problem. Turned out I was having a conversation with myself about it in my head. I showered and got changed then sat with my phone and typed into Evernote while my girlfriend dried her hair.
And it worked. Over the next day, I had a conversation with myself where I’d ask questions and respond then chip away at the answer until I’d made things simpler and more elegant. I took a few goes at it, refining my questioning until I got to something resembling a story. But it’s all sorted now, I hope. I’ve got a very solid story now in place of the black hole at the centre of a lot of writing. A very weird experiment but it really worked and it’s something I’ll do again.
How does it work? I think one of the things that have worked for me in the past has been talking to people about problems I’ve got with my books, which gets me to a good place having talked about it. This is talking about it in a way you can review after the fact. Mr Morrell finds himself starting writing the book – that’s not my style, daddio, but it’s a good way of working, certainly to get the central idea concrete and go all Occam’s razor on it; usually plots fall apart because they’re too complex – good plots are simple ideas executed in a complex way. Everyone’s actions and motivations have to be clear. The other thing is I’m a professional writer now and writing dialogue is what I do most days, so it’s something I’m good at. It’s practise for that and it’s a good way of problem solving.
— Ed